<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charge of the White Elephant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/blog/2010/02/charge-of-the-white-elephant.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/blog/2010/02/charge-of-the-white-elephant.html</link>
	<description>Bright Lights Film Journal&#039;s companion blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:29:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erich Kuersten</title>
		<link>http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/blog/2010/02/charge-of-the-white-elephant.html/comment-page-1#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich Kuersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Thanks Patrick, I&#039;m glad someone stuck up for this film against my rant. Harden does her best with the script, but ultimately it seemed just too thought out in that craftsmanship way - like she explains abstraction while admitting two guests, showing off paintings and preparing dinner all in a two minute scene. You&#039;re right that it&#039;s a storyline that doesn&#039;t really make for a great movie, at least not in this bourgeoisie gladhanding craftsmanship format. Sometimes a paint-dribbling drunk is just a drunk. In picking out a safely dead icon, even his premature ejaculations are elevated to a kind of Godly NYC legendariness, which is kind of anti everything the movement was supposed to be about, man! I.e. FACTORY GIRL (vs. say, a hot mess like CIAO, MANHATTAN or some horrifically dull--which was the style at the time--Morrissey film)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Patrick, I&#8217;m glad someone stuck up for this film against my rant. Harden does her best with the script, but ultimately it seemed just too thought out in that craftsmanship way &#8211; like she explains abstraction while admitting two guests, showing off paintings and preparing dinner all in a two minute scene. You&#8217;re right that it&#8217;s a storyline that doesn&#8217;t really make for a great movie, at least not in this bourgeoisie gladhanding craftsmanship format. Sometimes a paint-dribbling drunk is just a drunk. In picking out a safely dead icon, even his premature ejaculations are elevated to a kind of Godly NYC legendariness, which is kind of anti everything the movement was supposed to be about, man! I.e. FACTORY GIRL (vs. say, a hot mess like CIAO, MANHATTAN or some horrifically dull&#8211;which was the style at the time&#8211;Morrissey film)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/blog/2010/02/charge-of-the-white-elephant.html/comment-page-1#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-248</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen this movie since its release, so it has faded a bit in my memory, but at least one part I interepreted differently than you did.  The parts where Krasner talks about his art I took to be a way of distinguishing her approach as someone who intellectualized art and wanted to understand what was going on, and Pollock, who was instinctive, and maybe didn&#039;t even understand what he was doing.  I more or less liked the movie, not sure the story really lends itself to being turned into a great movie, but for me it at least recreated the period and the art scene of the time fairly well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen this movie since its release, so it has faded a bit in my memory, but at least one part I interepreted differently than you did.  The parts where Krasner talks about his art I took to be a way of distinguishing her approach as someone who intellectualized art and wanted to understand what was going on, and Pollock, who was instinctive, and maybe didn&#8217;t even understand what he was doing.  I more or less liked the movie, not sure the story really lends itself to being turned into a great movie, but for me it at least recreated the period and the art scene of the time fairly well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/blog/2010/02/charge-of-the-white-elephant.html/comment-page-1#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-240</guid>
		<description>I cant believe that I&#039;ve still haven&#039;t see Pollock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant believe that I&#8217;ve still haven&#8217;t see Pollock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 288/289 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.brightlightsfilm.com @ 2012-02-09 13:26:32 -->
