From the editor and writers of Bright Lights Film Journal
Action! Interviews with Directors from Classical Hollywood to Contemporary Iran
(Anthem Art and Culture), by Gary Morris (Editor), Bert Cardullo (Introduction), Jonathan Rosenbaum (Foreword). London and New York: Anthem Press, 2009.
(Anthem Art and Culture), by Gary Morris (Editor), Bert Cardullo (Introduction), Jonathan Rosenbaum (Foreword). London and New York: Anthem Press, 2009.
"I dare anyone to squeeze between
two covers a more varied, useful and
flat out entertaining sampling of
the personalities that make the
seventh art the liveliest."
David Hudson, IFC.com
David Hudson, IFC.com
Daddy and Father in The Emerald Forest
On civilization and its discontents
I recently saw a list of Luddite movies that listed Cameron's The
Terminator (1984), Chaplin's Modern Times (1936), and Lang's
Metropolis (1927), among others. Luddites opposed the large textile
factories, destroyed much of the machinery to save their own livelihoods.
The term, however, has since come to stand for the radical antitechnological
stances from the Unabomber's Manifesto to Jacques Ellul's book
The Technological Society to Jerry Mander's Four Arguments
for the Elimination of Television. Luddite movies dramatize a world
crushed or systematically exterminated by machines; thus, The Terminator
represents the worst Luddite scenario whence the machines pursue and
kill humans.
I was surprised to see The Gods Must Be Crazy (Jamie Uys, 1980)
on the list, although I shouldn't have been. The film satirizes civilization's
overdependence on technology, and how it has dumbed itself down in our
relations with the natural world. Yet The Gods' tone is never
severe, dogmatic, or apocalyptic. Indeed, we could better serve it by
creating another category, like "civilization versus noncivilization"
movie. This opposition exemplifies an extreme but less phobic design.
The Gods' innate critique depicts the civilized world in relief
or context and, in a sense, points out the dangers of being overcivilized
and of humans having lost their better instincts.
A more pensive film that establishes this split between civilized men
and native tribesmen (but not on the Luddite list) is John Boorman's
The Emerald Forest (1985). In the film, Bill Markham (Powers
Boothe) must engineer a new dam in the Amazon basin. Seemingly in reprisal,
a rainforest tribe called the Invisible People kidnaps the engineer's
son, Tommy (Charley Boorman), and the boy grows to manhood in the wilds.
The engineer searches for his son ten years, finds him, and discovers
the extent of the ravages on the Invisible People wrought by civilization.
One byproduct of indecent contacts with the civilized world is the Fierce
People, who attack the Invisible People's village and kidnap the women
to be prostitutes. Markham ultimately accepts his son's decision to
stay in the rain forest and blows up the dam in reparation for western
civilization's sins.
Before the boy's biological father reaches the village, Tommy has experienced
the Invisible People's harsh rites of manhood helped along by his Indian
father. The ritual, which includes the mixing of human ashes and blood
then drinking it, might repel us, but our reaction sharpens the real
distinction and gulf between the savages' lives and ours. The Indian
father, Wanadi, helps his adopted son in two ways. He is a teacher and
disciplinarian and must respond indifferently but not without love toward
his son's immediate suffering; second, he allows his son to achieve
an emotional independence from his parents.
The "father" role of male parenthood is brought into relief when the
engineer, sick and wounded, is being carried into the village. His son
calls out "Daddy"; the Invisible People recognize the name and react
excitedly. They had remembered how the boy for many years had referred
to this creature "Daddy" and, now, the villagers were meeting this legend
in the flesh. Daddy's legendary standing developed because the Indians,
engaged in a subsistence lifestyle, had never met someone so generous
and apparently all-tolerant. He's the person who wouldn't force his
son to drink ashes and blood, couldn't think of abandoning his son to
fend for himself, and would generally accede to his son's desire never
to become a man.
In the film's terms, the Indian "father" (Rui Polonah) is Daddy's surrogate
and must labor to bring the boy into manhood. Surrogate fathering enters
other Boorman films. In Excalibur (1981), Arthur (Nigel Terry)
has three fathers. Uther Pendragon (Gabriel Byrne) sires a son but must
give him up at birth. Ector (Clive Swift) serves as the Daddy, although
not one who has spoiled his adopted son. Meanwhile, Merlin (Nicol Williamson)
initiates the man into the mysteries of life, in the role similar to
the Indian father. In Hope and Glory (1987), a boy grows up virtually
fatherless in war-torn London amidst his sister, mother, and grandparents.
The Emerald Forest adds to Boorman's continuing scenario whence
male parent roles have been left in a weakened condition. Technological
progress, symbolized by the dam being built by the engineer, elevates
the "daddy" functions to an institutional level. Governments and societies
evade or elide the burden of producing mature and responsible peoples.
The reason is unimportant for the film, but one could suggest that living
within a progressive model of life tends to make us undervalue the rites
of growing up if not many other rites of passage. The Daddy is equivalent
to a sentimental virus endemic to the overcivilized. Excessive daddy-ing
erodes and destroys the spirit of our descendants. Western man's best
intentions, especially its goal to reduce or eradicate human suffering,
belie a fear of the future, that is, a virtual dread of mortality
a theme Boorman amplifies in Zardoz (1974).
Besides the atomic and hydrogen bombs, western civilization has given
the world Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, bacteriological and chemical
weapons, the annihilation of the uncivilized world, the indiscriminate
slaughter of wildlife, the invisible destructiveness of chlorofluorocarbons,
the appalling Bhopal-like disasters, and the apocalypse now: the greenhouse
effect. Contemporary men and women want to have it both ways: we decry
the horrors perpetrated by our technological society, yet we continue
to enjoy this society's benefits. Analogously, we persist with this
untenable situation and try to be both Daddies and Fathers to our children.
Our malaise appears near fatal, a return to health and invigoration
both spiritual and environmental highly doubtful or, at
least, as doubtful as the possibility of a rapprochement between the
native and civilized worlds.
Subscribe to BLFJ
Contact Us
Never miss a movie again -- by using online video recorders! Start recording online now!






