actor profiles

animation

book reviews

director profiles

documentaries

experimental &
avant garde


exploitation

film festivals

film noir

film reviews

gay & lesbian

hong kong films

horror

interviews

japanese cinema

music & musicals

silent film

tranny cinema
 
- - - - - -
To be automatically notified when the next issue is posted, join our mailing list.

 

home | current issue | archives | search | about us | contact | donate | blog | links

Spider-Man
Spider-Man
There's No 'There' There

Why Tobey Maguire has us by the testicles
and why he isn’t going to let go

Whence Spider-Man? Whence, indeed, and whither?

It has come to pass in these United States that you can spend $100 million making a film that has no more flavor than a glass of warm tap water and sell it for $1 billion. Spider-Man lacks the gee-whiz impact of the original Star Wars; the campy atmospherics of Batman; the in-your-face stupidity of Independence Day, Armageddon, and Twister; the hokey romance of Titanic; and even the ponderous self-indulgence of The Phantom Menace. In fact, it lacks everything.

Spider-Man

Spider-Man is nothing more or less than a flat-footed retelling of the story of "Spiderman," as set forth in the 1962 comic book. Nothing has been added, and nothing has been taken away, with the possible exception of Kirsten Dunst’s nipples, which are on screen for approximately two seconds.1

The original comic book was composed exclusively of clichés stolen from the Superman comic books, which began in 1939, and the film Spider-Man preserves these clichés with scrupulous care.2 Today’s filmgoers are paying good money to see story lines that were retro to their grandparents. To call Spider-Man formulaic is an insult to infants. A babe wet from the womb would find this pap unadventurous.

Spider-ManWhere will it all end? Obviously, it isn’t going to. Aggressively stupid films like The Mummy, The Mummy Returns, and The Scorpion King all did huge box office. Spider-Man will easily gross more than all three combined for no reason other than that it is more inoffensive.

The inoffensive blockbuster! A film without any ideas at all! This is Hollywood’s masterpiece!

NOTES

1. For this relief, much thanks. Perhaps in the sequel we can see them for three seconds.

2. So does the current Spiderman comic strip. Peter Parker has just gotten the same cub photographer job he got in 1962, and he runs around 2002 Manhattan taking pictures of warehouse fires.

August 2002 | Issue 37
Copyright © 2002 by Alan Vanneman

ALSO: More film reviews